In re Flonase Antitrust Litig., 2:08-cv-3301 (E.D.Pa.). Chimicles & Tikellis represents indirect purchaser plaintiffs in this antitrust case, which alleges that the manufacturer of Flonase engaged in anticompetitive conduct designed to delay entry of cheaper, generic versions of the drug. The court has denied motions to dismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendant.
[accordion-item id=”item-1″ title=”Email us about this Case”]
[accordion-item id=”item-2″ title=”Alert me to Case updates”]
[widgets_on_pages id=”Email Alerts”]