Court Rules that Subaru Starlink Class Action Can Proceed into Discovery
The Magistrate Judge in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a ruling largely denying Defendant Subaru’s motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of its motion to dismiss. The Judge’s order found Subaru’s concerns about the expense of discovery “overblown” and acknowledged that even Subaru concedes that some of plaintiffs’ claims will survive its motion. The Judge ordered the parties to meet and confer, exchange initial disclosures and scheduled a Rule 16 conference. The consumers represented by Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP (CSK&D) filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint against defendants Subaru of America, Inc. and Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. The Amended Complaint alleges that the “Starlink” infotainment system in certain Subarus suffer from technical glitches that cause it to freeze, become non-responsive, or otherwise malfunction.
If you would like more information about this case, please either fill out the intake form or contact the attorneys below.
(*) Indicates required field: When communicating with us through this site or otherwise in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged or confidential, and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and our Firm.
Attorneys for this case:
Benjamin F. Johns
Alex M. Kashurba