California – All Cases

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1

In re Apple iPhone/iPod Warranty Litig.

Jurisdiction: N.D. Cal.

City: San Francisco

Case Status: Resolved

Plaintiffs alleged that Apple improperly denied warranty coverage for iPhone and iPod Touch devices. Apple agreed to pay $53 million to settle the case. The average payment to Settlement Class Members represented approximately 117% of the replacement costs for those devices.

2

In re MyFord Touch Consumer Litigation

Jurisdiction: N.D. Cal.

City: San Francisco

Case Status: Pending

C&T is one of the co-lead counsel representing consumers in this class action on behalf of owners and lessees of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles with MyFord Touch®, an in-car communication and entertainment package, allegedly flawed, putting drivers at risk of an accident while also causing economic hardship for owners.

3

Rodman v. Safeway Inc.

Jurisdiction: N.D. Cal.

City: San Francisco

Case Status: Pending

This case involves secret price markups for groceries ordered online for home delivery through Safeway.com, Genuardis.com, and Vons.com. In December 2015, the Court entered a $41.9 million judgment in favor of the class, which represents the full amount of the markups plus prejudgment interest.

4

In re Chiron Shareholder Deal Litig., Consol.

Jurisdiction: Cal.

City: Oakland

Case Status: Resolved

In these actions, stockholders challenged the proposed acquisition of Chiron Corporation by its 42% stockholder, Novartis AG. A settlement was negotiated which included, among other things, a further increase in the merger price to $48 per share, or an additional $330 million for the public stockholders of Chiron.

5

Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties, L.P.

Jurisdiction: American Arbitration Association

City: Oakland

Case Status: Resolved

The Arbitrator approved a $4.58 million case settlement which provided an additional payment of approximately $74 per Unit for the unaffiliated investors of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties, L.P. against Apartment Investment and Management Company and its affiliates, who were alleged to have breached fiduciary duties in proposing and implementing the merger.

6

In re Phoenix Leasing Incorporated Limited Partnership Litig.

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of the State of California

City: San Rafael

Case Status: Resolved

Action filed against five public partnerships sponsored by Phoenix Leasing Incorporated and its affiliates alleging fraud, misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary which resulted in entry of a judgment in favor of the class in the amount of $21 million.

7

California Tax Refund Actions

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of the State of California

City: Los Angeles

Case Status: Resolved

Class action alleging that the city of Los Angeles unlawfully charged city residents and business owners a telephone user tax. A settlement was reached with the city of Los Angeles worth up to $92.5 million.

8

In re Real Estate Associates Limited Partnerships Litig.

Jurisdiction: C.D. Cal

City: Los Angeles

Case Status: Resolved

Class action asserting federal securities fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims on behalf of investors. The jury returned a $185 million verdict (including $92.5 million in punitive damages) in favor of the investors. The verdict was among the “Top 10” Verdicts of 2002. The case settled for $83 million.

9

Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp., et al.

Jurisdiction: C.D. Cal

City: Los Angeles

Case Status: Resolved

Consumer class action involving alleged design defects in Whirlpool, Kenmore, and Kitchenaid dishwashers that can cause the control board to overheat or catch fire. The settlement relief includes, among other things, up to 100% of repair costs, or up to $300 towards the purchase of a new dishwasher.

10

Lockabey et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Jurisdiction: San Diego Superior Court

City: San Diego

Case Status: Resolved

Settlement valued by court at $170 million for a class of 460,000 purchasers and lessees of Honda Civic Hybrids to resolve claims that the vehicle was advertised with fuel economy representations it could not achieve under real-world driving conditions, and that a software update to the IMA system further decreased fuel economy and performance.